Random header image... Refresh for more!

Is Weight Loss Only About Calories Consumed?

* Feature Article: Is Weight Loss Only About Calories Consumed?

* Your Questions Answered: Calories and Weight Loss

Is Weight Loss Only About Calories Consumed?

I recently stumbled upon this interesting Princeton study on high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and weight gain, the results of which I thought might interest you.

The experiment involved two groups of rats: one fed rat chow along with HFCS and the other fed rat chow along with a water-sucrose (refined sugar) solution.  The amount of HFCS given was half as concentrated as most soft drinks, while the sugar solution was about equal to that as the amount found in soft drinks.

The result?  The fructose fed rats gained significantly more weight than the sucrose-fed rats.

But by far the most interesting part?  Both groups of rats were fed the SAME amount of calories!

And still, every single rat fed high-fructose corn syrup instead of plain sucrose became obese.  The males were especially effected, with a 48% weight gain over the sucrose-fed rats!

The researchers admit that they do not know for sure why the HFCS fed rats gain more weight, however:

…as a result of the manufacturing process for high-fructose corn syrup, the fructose molecules in the sweetener are free and unbound, ready for absorption and utilization. In contrast, every fructose molecule in sucrose that comes from cane sugar or beet sugar is bound to a corresponding glucose molecule and must go through an extra metabolic step before it can be utilized.

This creates a fascinating puzzle. The rats in the Princeton study became obese by drinking high-fructose corn syrup, but not by drinking sucrose. The critical differences in appetite, metabolism and gene expression that underlie this phenomenon are yet to be discovered, but may relate to the fact that excess fructose is being metabolized to produce fat, while glucose is largely being processed for energy or stored as a carbohydrate, called glycogen, in the liver and muscles.

So much for “a calorie is a calorie is a calorie”, eh? ;)

You can find the full story here:

http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S26/91/22K07/

Go raw and be fit,

Swayze

P.S. Wanna lose weight permanently, while still eating as much food as is humanly possible?  Then you gotta go low fat raw vegan.

Luckily, I have a raw recipe book to help you with that:

Low Fat, Fruit Filled, High Fun Raw Recipes

Calories and Weight Loss

Shirley asks:

I’m trying to go raw but I also have some weight to lose. [I] have your five week transition program but I’m a little curious as to how one can lose weight eating all those calories as you suggest so if you could please help with this question it would be greatly appreciated.

The meals are just a guideline.  Each person will need more or less calories depending on their height, weight, and activity level.

I admit, something like 1000 calories for a meal does sound like a lot.  In fact, many people will think it is impossible to eat that much food in one sitting.

It isn’t.  I regularly eat this much in bananas for both my breakfast and lunch meals.  I really just want to show what’s possible.

Does that mean you should eat this much?  Not at all.  It completely depends on how active you are.  A 120 pound sedentary female probably will not need 1000 calories at a meal.

Just eat as much as you like at each meal until you are satisfied and you will be fine.  Monitor your weight and body fat % on a regular basis and if you don’t see any change at all after about 3 months, try shaving off no more than a couple hundred calories per day.

Swayze

P.S. For those who would like access to The Fool Proof Transition to Raw that Shirley mentions above, simply fill out the form in the upper right hand corner of this page.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg

6 comments

1 Joan { 07.26.10 at 7:24 am }

Very interesting study! So many think that sugar is sugar is sugar and avoid fruit because of it – they are really missing out on good nutrients and energy sources…

[Reply]

2 Peter { 07.26.10 at 9:55 am }

Be careful with diatomateous earth! A respected veterinarian here who uses accupuncture and chiropractic on animals has treated horses fed with diatomaceous earth who suffered colon damage because of it.

[Reply]

Swayze Reply:

That’s why I definitely don’t recommend consumption by humans or animals.

[Reply]

3 C.L { 07.26.10 at 9:49 pm }

Hmm that’s a very interesting finding… what do you think about agave syrup then, since it’s fructose content is similar to that of HFCS?
Also, refined white sucrose may not lead to as much weight gain as HFCS, but it’s just as – if not even more – dangerous. White sugar is stripped of all its minerals and vitamins, with the result that our body has to deplete essential minerals such as calcium (by leaching it from our bones and teeth), magnesium, etc to digest it. White sugar also creates an overly-acidic state in our body, and in Sugar Blues by William Dufty, it’s compared to a legal, sweet-tasting drug like cocaine. Our body has totally no need for white sugar at all, and it’s a poison that kills us slowly…

[Reply]

Swayze Reply:

I wrote an article about raw sweeteners here:

http://www.fitonraw.com/2010/02/raw-sweeteners-raw-and-healthy/

[Reply]

4 GNLD International UK { 08.07.10 at 12:49 am }

I don’t think agave nectar is anywhere near as bad as high fructose corn syrup. HFCS has a really high glycemic index, and is super refined.

I guess what concerns me is the amount of fructose in agave nectar, and the problems that go with that (as mentioned in the article). It’s for that very reason that I stopped using crystaline fructose for baking and stuff. If I wasn’t diabetic, I would absolutely use honey.

[Reply]

Leave a Comment